Causality overall is hard. Humans fail at dealing fully with casual perfectly fairly often. But human tend to do far better than computers (partly failing rather than totally failing, etc).
But your examples involve human's linguistic expression of casualty, which is an entirely different question.
The amusing thing about this question is that if you actually have an answer, it reveals more about your biases than it does about the situation and potential solution(s). Various people will chime in about the latest thing that annoys them...whether it is inattentive pedestrians, jaywalkers, pedestrians wearing black at night, drunk drivers, speeders, or people driving cars that are too big and dangerous.
A lot of human language is "socially significant noise", which some might object usually isn't true. But it often serves an entirely different purpose than an accurate modeling of reality.
People walk through complex society, putting their socks on before their shoes and otherwise doing the basic things but articulating positions that ... other people would consider "nuts" but this situation has nothing to do with a failure of casual modeling, which happens on a different logical level entirely.
But your examples involve human's linguistic expression of casualty, which is an entirely different question.
The amusing thing about this question is that if you actually have an answer, it reveals more about your biases than it does about the situation and potential solution(s). Various people will chime in about the latest thing that annoys them...whether it is inattentive pedestrians, jaywalkers, pedestrians wearing black at night, drunk drivers, speeders, or people driving cars that are too big and dangerous.
A lot of human language is "socially significant noise", which some might object usually isn't true. But it often serves an entirely different purpose than an accurate modeling of reality.
People walk through complex society, putting their socks on before their shoes and otherwise doing the basic things but articulating positions that ... other people would consider "nuts" but this situation has nothing to do with a failure of casual modeling, which happens on a different logical level entirely.