Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why do you think it's limited to the FOSS world? Surely most SaaS companies (and certainly the most profitable) are business-to-business companies, and presumably they're quite a lot more valuable than the average library vendor. I would also hazard a guess that onprem services occupy an intermediate tier both in terms of profitability and in terms of integration model: they're a whole service (as opposed to a lib) but the customer is on the hook for integrating and operating (as opposed to SaaS).



Because a large majority of those developers feels entitled to get everything for free.

If I want to get money (not donations) I rather target traditional corps.


I agree that if you want to make money you shouldn't target FOSS, but how does that fit into the "libs vs saas" conversation?


SaaS are the easiest solution to achieve payments from FOSS consumers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: