Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If I read it correctly, California state constitution amendments are from popular vote in the state - the California legislature can only put them on the ballot to be voted on (and then, its a 2/3 vote there - easier to get 8% of the previous total vote to petition).

The Supreme Court can't rule against it because it is constitutional because it is the constitution.




In Baker v Carr I think the SC struck down part of TN constitution for voting malapportionment. Later it did so in AL too.


There have been a number of legal challenges of it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_California_Proposition_13...

In particular:

> In 1992, a legal challenge (Nordlinger v. Hahn) was considered by the United States Supreme Court, which subsequently ruled 8–1 that Proposition 13 was constitutional.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: