Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Anyone know why they can't get licensed in every city?

Or is something preventing them form doing that, because licensing is inherently a way to protect old cartels from new cheaper/better upstarts?




Taxis are state-sanctioned cartels in many cities. The number of "licenses" (medallions) is capped to inflate the revenues of existing businesses. In San Francisco (where Uber's legal problems are), the quota is ~1,400, and there's a waiting list more than 10 years long to get a "license".

http://www.medallionholders.com/medallions.html (n.b. this is cartel-funded propaganda)

http://www.sfweekly.com/2010-01-27/news/cabbies-cry-foul-ove...

It's exactly what it looks like: they've criminalized competition. You get prison for "stealing" business from union thugs.


This cartel appears to be the product of a joint effort between the taxi corporations and the drivers union. I don't hear the cab firms arguing for greater competition or an increase in the number of taxis either.


Yes, licensing requirements generally protect incumbents. In SF (and I assume other large cities) it's very political.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: