I think you got me confused with someone else. I don't have any other comments in this thread.
How can you honestly say "Imagine trying to paint being against political violence as a partisan issue." while doing absolutely everything you can to minimize and excuse left-wing violence?
You completely dodged the one thing that is actually asked of the reader and tried to jump over the fact this entire thread is based on insinuating an abject lie: that anyone downplayed the George Floyd protests or what happened on Pennsylvania Avenue in any way.
-
And how is saying that a successful breach of the Capitol Building while congress was trying to certify a new president that resulted in Congresspeople being subject to a clear and eminent danger...
should naturally be a bigger deal than people the Secret Service of all organizations are saying never posed a threat...
excusing the latter?
It's saying call a spade a spade.
Some people just can't handle that though. They need to act like it's not that big of a deal and the fact breaching the Capitol building tends to turn up the heat more than a group that never made it to the fence of the White House is a conspiracy.
If you can't handle the heat, don't breech the Capitol with Congress in session.
Surely the biggest difference between successful breach of the Capitol and an unsuccessful attack on the White House is the defence? Clearly the attackers/rioters had malicious intent both times, clearly they very extremely violent. The only real difference is the success/failure of the security forces.
That's one of the biggest differences, yes... did I imply otherwise?
The other two are the trigger and the timing.
The trigger being the President, and the timing, while Congress was in session trying to confirm the next President were what took it even further into the public consciousness.
I don't read the news much, so this is the first I'm hearing of people attacking the White House. These supposedly Trump-supporters... were attacking Trump?
The Secret Service referred to it as a demonstration, but people who are upset that the alt-right invading Capitol is a big deal, so they want to retroactively create equivalency to everything that happened over the summer...
so this HN reader overruled the Secret Service and labeled it an attack
How can you honestly say "Imagine trying to paint being against political violence as a partisan issue." while doing absolutely everything you can to minimize and excuse left-wing violence?