> I believe the premise of the title. But the main question should be: why? And the article does not really answer that, well beyond censorship.
There's two types of articles around politicized topics like this:
1. Those dealing with Why: for the unconverted
2. Those dealing with How: for the converted
Both types are necessary, but I feel often articles that are being read by "the converted" spend far too long trying to deal with the "Why" (preaching to the converted). So this article is refreshing in that sense.
There's two types of articles around politicized topics like this:
1. Those dealing with Why: for the unconverted
2. Those dealing with How: for the converted
Both types are necessary, but I feel often articles that are being read by "the converted" spend far too long trying to deal with the "Why" (preaching to the converted). So this article is refreshing in that sense.