By the way, light has no speed. Light is not a "thing" that "moves" through space, even if it is a particle. Source and target of light incidence simply exchange their excitations through entanglement, symmetrically. There is no direction of movement. And there is no movement.
I believe you're right. While I'm not a physicist by profession, I took enough high level physics to be dangerous. The way I interpret lorentz contraction and time dilation, there will always be a possible observer for which the photon does not need to exist because the interacting particles collided.
This is in much the same way that there is always a possible observer that sees only electrical interactions when magnetic fields are involved for other observers.
I haven't read this somewhere. I was just consolidating my thoughts through reasoning. The first abnormality I observed was light propagation having a direction that is asymmetric between source and target. There is no room for that asymmetry. Next is, assumption that time, space and causality exist independent of light, and movement of light being described in terms of those concepts. This can't be true, because all these (light, time, space, change, causality, direction etc) only have mutual existence but not independent or absolute existence. So, light can't be described in terms of others as if others already exist. For more discussion, you can ping me at vrpbkp_at_gmail.
