> So AWS is now the arbiter of what actions are supposedly harmful to the fabric of democratic society?
No. AWS asserts the right to deny access to its infrastructure for violation of its terms of service, and the right to determine what those terms of service are.
I think this is an opportunity for someone else to sell infrastructure with zero content restrictions. There is clearly a market.
No. AWS asserts the right to deny access to its infrastructure for violation of its terms of service, and the right to determine what those terms of service are.
I think this is an opportunity for someone else to sell infrastructure with zero content restrictions. There is clearly a market.