Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> I actually really like the anti overtime policy (half your hourly rate after 20h / week)... I suspect that scares off workaholics.

I suspect that anti-overtime policy, at scale, is somewhat like a salaried position. When you earn a salary, your salary is guaranteed regardless of how many hours that you put in. Why work more than 40 hours a week? But in the real world, gains and promotion often go to people who "bleed" for the company. If salaried positions, which offer zero overtime pay, end up promoting overwork, why would offering a partial reward of half-pay factor in at all into whether the company has an overwork culture problem or not (particularly if reporting hours is the responsibility of the employee and the employee can simply decide not to report the overtime hours)?




I suspect setting the bar at 20h sends a reasonably strong signal.

Even if people do overwork, they should only do it with that as a baseline, which should keep anyone from 80 hour workweeks far away (why would I work there for 80h/week when Netflix would pay me 2-4x for that much work?)

You might see people working 40h/week but I'm not seeing why that is bad for the company or culture.

I think you're pushing at "there will be people who really want a pay raise and they will work long hours to get it" but I honestly just don't see that happening. It only happens if it's rewarded, and they've set up what seems to be a strong culture that motivates people to not work too much.

It seems like their current culture consists of people who don't want to be defined by their work. The post notes this explicitly.

If the employees will overwork, I suspect it will be on their side projects, and more power to them




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: