I don't know where (for example) Mark Zuckerberg was born, nor when, and nor do I care.
I know the parts which are relevant to Zuckerberg's story: that he was likely born in the US, and was likely around 20 when he founded Facebook.
A journalistic interpretation of Larson's childhood is speculative non-sense. The journalist was not there, and does not even cite who thought Larson was "creative and intelligent".
It doesn't add anything (for me), except that the journalist presenting themself as an omniscient narrator makes the article read as a fictional story.
Zuckerberg was a child of privilege raised in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the US and attended an extremely elite private high school. That's relevant.
I know the parts which are relevant to Zuckerberg's story: that he was likely born in the US, and was likely around 20 when he founded Facebook.
A journalistic interpretation of Larson's childhood is speculative non-sense. The journalist was not there, and does not even cite who thought Larson was "creative and intelligent".
It doesn't add anything (for me), except that the journalist presenting themself as an omniscient narrator makes the article read as a fictional story.