Not saying it was stolen, but just adding some perspective...
Some people don't agree with the courts decisions, especially when they are ruling contrary to state constitution or law. You can see this in some of the rulings for PA election law. For example, some counties were counting mail-in ballots with deficiencies, while others were not. In some cases, like the PA senate seat that spans Alleghany and Westmoreland counties, this would lead to some people's deficienct mail-in votes either counting or not counting based solely on if they live in one county vs the other. Or that the PA constitution and voting law is very explicit in detailing what events qualify one to use a mail-in ballot.
So in specific scenarios (which may or may not have swayed the election), it appears that rule of law may have been violated. And that in itself is concerning.
Someone replied "Go read the court documents and see why they shot it down."
They shot it down because the accusations made in court were all petty nothings. For all the big talk of fraud and theft, that's not what was in those filings.
The question was asked, and has been thoroughly investigated at this point, but the administration did not like what they heard so they're pretending they never got the answer. It's childish and embarrassing for them to continue pretending that the question is still open.
Unfortunately we have many examples of debunked theories that maintain a public consciousness for a very long time. MSG, Flat Earth, Vaccine induced autism, Creationism, etc... All it takes is for motivated people to refuse to accept the evidence and continue repeating unfounded claims as if they were still valid. They can do this until they grow old and die, and there will always be at least a few people who follow.
