Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The law has no trouble distinguishing between something that happens as a side effect and something that is intended.



I don't believe you in the slightest. The people who wrote the bill in question either didn't think of what happens to Google, or they want it to happen to Google, or they consider it something like "you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: