Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is it illegal, or contract-breaking etc., to run the "trial" forever?


In theory, you would most likely be in violation of your license to utilize Microsoft’s intellectual property. In practice, they don’t seem to care much. I suspect most of their Windows-related profits come from enterprises and OEMs.


Do Microsoft even still "care" about Windows these days? I speculate they will eventually make it freemium to hook new users so they grow up and subscribe to their real cash cow - Office.


According to their 2018 reporting, Windows and Xbox is actually making more money than Office. In reality, they have an almost even three way split between Productivity, Azure, and Personal.

https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/02/19/heres-how-microsof...


5 years ago they changed their reporting segments and buried Windows in with devices because they knew which way it was heading

Low-margin high-volume sales of Xbox and Surface etc. really distort that segment to the point where it's almost useless to attempt to derive what Windows is worth anymore

This reflects Satyas move and shifts away from Balmers attempts to claw onto Windows as a profit center


They probably care if someone does it large scale, but for individuals it seems fairly clear that they'd prefer people running a current Windows they didn't pay for over them sticking with an outdated version or switching elsewhere.


EULAs are not contracts.


> EULAs are not contracts.

Literally the first sentence on wikipedia:

>An end-user license agreement (EULA, /ˈjuːlə/) is a legal contract entered into between a software developer or vendor and the user of the software

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-user_license_agreement


Contracts have negotiated terms. You can't redline an EULA.


Contracts require both parties to agree not negotiation. I think your idea that EULA are not contracts is wishful thinking.


>Contracts have negotiated terms

Is that a mandatory requirement for a contract? There's this, for instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_form_contract#Contrac...


Yes and no.

For a contract to be binding, there has to be consideration [1] from both parties.

[1]: https://www.australiancontractlaw.com/contractlaw/formation-...

>Consideration is the price that is asked by the promisor in exchange for their promise – the price for a promise.

>In many jurisdictions consideration is not an essential element of a contract – it is sufficient that parties have reached a binding agreement. However, the common law requires that (subject to limited exceptioins), for an agreement to be binding, the promisee (or promisees) must provide consideration (payment of some kind) for the promise they have received.

>As a result, gratuitous promises are generally not enforceable.


Consideration doesn't have to be monetary, in the case of the Windows EULA Microsoft are receiving someone who may or may not go on to buy other Microsoft products, while the end-user is receiving a copy of Windows they can use for the period of the trial.


Ok, but the question is, would a legally-knowledgeable, unbiased person say I’ve done something legally “wrong” if I use Windows without entering a license key?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: