Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is what annoys me about Nix the most - the missing abstraction of those, resulting in an often cumbersome UX and a very steep learning curve.

Guix on the other hand provides those, but is far from what nixpkgs offers in terms of number and actuality of pkgs.




I think it's somewhat unfair to use number of packages vs Nix as an argument against Guix.

Nixpkgs has the biggest package repository of all the distributions, and a much larger community.

If you compare Guix against Arch for example, Guix comes out more favorably (15k packages) vs Arch's 12k.

Guix packages tend to be very well integrated too, usually running upstream test suites, leading to fewer run-time problems. I think only Debian and Fedora matches Guix on this practice.


Nixpkgs also has a lot of generated packages that cannot actually be built successfully, such as a large number of R packages.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: