Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You have to trust their promise that their anonymous submission process is actually reasonably anonymous. Many whistleblowers probably couldn't tell between an anonymous process and a seemingly anonymous process that isn't.



OK, but if you're going to be that paranoid you shouldn't trust Wikileaks either, right?


Right. But in this case trusting WSJ to keep your anonymous submission secure as well as trusting their ability to run a leaks site would be a mistake:

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/06/wall-street-journal...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: