Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No, it doesn't.

Especially since the RIAA isn't suing a member on behalf of a non-member.

It's simply sending a takedown notice to a member who happens to be hosting something on a subsidiary's website.




"Kink" is an observation of the peculiarly ironic nature of the claim. Not a legal argument.

Though experience shows judicial temperment may take note of such quirks.

You seem stongly inclined to object to any element no matter how tenuously germane. It's a bad look.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: