I'm sorry, English is not my first language. I did in fact read every word in your post, but still don't understand it. Can you maybe rephrase it? I am pretty sure that this discussion here is not about climate change, but about the effects of higher CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere, on CO2 concentrations indoors.
I'm a fluent English speaker, and I'm also having a hard time figuring out your point. And it seems ambiguous what exactly you're calling "flaming crap".
tpmx: I can't respond to your post since it's dead.
There's probably not a way I can convince I'm not lying, but I'm not.
"Not supposed to be negative of anything technical even if it's flaming crap".
I honestly still don't know which flaming crap you're referring to. All I know is that it's technical. For all I can tell, it could quite conceivably be OP. Your entire point is lost on me. I don't see any reason not to solve the technical problem at hand. On the contrary, I think that's a great idea.
