What was the point of this comment? You listen using a service that abuses its users and you want everyone to know it, sure, but...there's literally no substance to the comment. It's pure fluff. You didn't even explain why or give any reasoning whatsoever. Just, "I do [thing]."
If the way Audible treats me is abuse, I can only say I wish more companies were abusive.
It is absolutely frictionless and cheaper than competing services.
All my titles are available on all my devices, and progress syncs perfectly.
As a consumer, it is far far easier and more convenient than having to manually download mp3s off a shared drive or something, never mind the issue of how you sync progress.
This gets to one of the main issues. Opponents of DRM need an equivalent service (ubiquity of apps for listening, reliability of progress syncing, discoverability of new content) and they need to market it. Audible has become synonymous with audiobooks for many people, so alternate services need better marketing to reach those consumers.
> You listen using a service that abuses its users
It doesn't abuse me. It makes my life net better than it was before I used it.
This is a really important point for you - many people value what they practically get from a service - not abstract concepts of freedom.
What I care about is getting to listen to the book. I don't care about your DRM problems. I don't care about file formats. I care about the words that the author wrote going into my head. That's what I came for. If they give me that I'm a happy customer.
> which literally contributed nothing at all to the discussion
They contributed the same thought as I expanded on - what they care about is the book, not technical issues. That’s a useful thing to comment because it’s what 99% of people care about.
