You don't pick ideas at random, but then you can't classify them as good or bad either? So how do you pick them?? Random also matches up with your lottery analogy.
The logic of the article's statement is still flawed anyway.
A good idea [without great execution] [is] worthless.
A good idea is worthless.
^ That's what the sentence reduces to, and it's nonsense. And talking about selling is a massive oversimplification of the issue.
IMHO, that's not a possible reduction -- things have value with context attached (what is value anyway without context?). And if evaluated by boolean algebra, it also doesn't compile as ... second statement implies first statement, but not the other way around, unless first statement is false ;)
Sure, a value must be rooted in another concept, ie. it must be a value to someone (ultimately they'd judge it in the context of does it improve their life, although a whole chain of other values may be necessary to reach that point), but so in turn must value judgements such as 'good' or 'bad' be in the context of value. (Which was my original point.)
For instance we have images of far away galaxies that don't exist anymore, you certainly cannot sell one of them and they have no value to us - so it would be ridiculous to talk about faraway nonexistant galaxies being good or bad.
The logic of the article's statement is still flawed anyway.
^ That's what the sentence reduces to, and it's nonsense. And talking about selling is a massive oversimplification of the issue.