Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

A Nature paper [0] suggests that 66 or even 95 percent of the cases could be avoided, had China acted on the coronavirus 1 to 3 weeks earlier [1].

[0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2293-x

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/11/research-finds...




But that paper, at least in the abstract, talks about preventable deaths in China. The anti-communists talk about China being to blame for the deaths in other countries because those countries had no warning.


The paper was posted on March 13 [0], before Covid-19 peaked outside of China. Of course it didn’t focus on other places.

The abstract shows the authors believe its findings have relevance elsewhere:

> These findings improve our understanding of the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19, and will inform response efforts across the world

[0] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.03.20029843v...


But what does that have to do with countries having plenty of warning and doing next to nothing? I feel like you replied to the wrong poster.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: