Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> But on the other hand complex models such as Neural Networks are being used for very wide datasets with incredible amounts of parameters, so that understanding a single parameter's contribution is not useful in the real world.

In the near future AI and statisticians will need to cooperate by:

1. Finding means for extracting rules/general principles from neural networks.

2. Creating new fields of statistics that can handle multi-dimensional data sets, such as by representing them as small-dimensional datasets that interact (?), which converges to the same multidimensional model when the modeler sutures these interactions (?) together according to a topological structure.

We know that we can do this because somehow human beings reason about complex systems successfully.



There’s a whole field around 1 called explainable ai. Interestingly, one of the SOTA techniques, SHOP values, comes from economics (game theory).

Regarding the article, I think it was a good read, but as a data scientist on a research at Amazon, there’s a reason our interviews have shifted from stats-heavy to more cs-heavy: the ability to actually implement and maintain analytic products is just more useful. (Note, this isn’t across the board - we still hire PhD-level candidates to do research).


>human beings reason about complex systems successfully

Have you SEEN economics?


It's conceivable that humans minds are not perfectly modeled by software neural networks.

If neural networks are not perfect models of our minds, then your last paragraph does not hold.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: