Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Couldn't it be said Wikipedia is basically complete? Which would explain the declining number of edits



A comprehensive encyclopedia is never complete.


Never is a very, very long time.

At some point in an encyclopedia's lifetime, it's "complete enough" that you'll see an excess of authors. "Compiling the world's information" and, past that, "compiling current events as they happen" (with a side of "occasionally improving/updating old articles") need very different numbers of authors.


> Couldn't it be said Wikipedia is basically complete?

No.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: