Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I was going to joke about Intel "discovering the big.LITTLE architecture" until you said different instruction sets. It will be interesting to hear how they hope that will work out...



I think in this instance "instruction set" means "set of supported instructions" instead of "architecture".


Sure but that’s still a nuisance from the point of view of OS scheduling. You can’t transparently move a process from a big core to a little core or vice versa the way you can with big.little.


No, but it can be a small nuisance: you can leave a process eligible to run on any core until it faults for an illegal instruction; then you pin it to the big core.


big.LITTLE kind of is different instruction sets though - full ARM vs thumb.


The full ARM vs Thumb split never had anything to do with big.LITTLE, and was dropped with AArch64.


ARMv7 and ARMv 8 are full-on thumb2. Big.little has nothing to do with ARM vs thumb.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: