Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

On the other hand, one could also attribute github's success to git's success. I suppose it's most likely symbiotic: github contributed to git's success and vice versa.



That's undoubtedly true, but I wonder if the GitHub guys had picked up Mercurial instead if it would have grown as fast.


It git or it github?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: