I've read first two chapters and had to put it down. The first two chapters clearly outlines the agenda or "the side" of the author. Nothing wrong with that. Authors side is basically

debtor: good lender: bad

I have empathy for the horrific stories author shares, but my logic was seeking the obvious topic that never came (in those two chapters). What if lenders decided to not lend? Wouldn't that leave those poor souls in Madagascar in even worse position?

The book is propaganda.