Says who? You? You know how I know it's worth that much? Because he already has that much. The free market has decided.
>That's where Bezos was decades ago.
Nope.
>So basically, you agree with me except that you had to jump in to defend a poor defenseless multibillion dollar international company?
My principles don't discriminate by dollar figure or other arbitrary measures. That's what makes them principles.
>Great: why don't you do that instead of derailing any effort by jumping in to defend Amazon?
I can do both? Isn't that what you were preaching before?
>Dude, you're so set on diverting focus away from Amazon's wrong doing if Amazon literally stabbed someone you'd comment how it alleviated their high blood pressure.
> Says who? You? You know how I know it's worth that much? Because he already has that much. The free market has decided.
Which only goes to show that the free market is absolutely terrible at deciding things.
> > That's where Bezos was decades ago.
> Nope.
Well, actually, Bezos did surpass the $10 million in wealth mark at least two decades ago, so I'm really not sure what you're on about.
> My principles don't discriminate by dollar figure or other arbitrary measures. That's what makes them principles.
What principle are you applying here exactly?
> I can do both? Isn't that what you were preaching before?
But you aren't doing both. You're just defending Amazon. You claim to care about worker's rights and not like Amazon and Bezos, but all I see you doing here is saying Amazon and Bezos deserve what they get and the workers deserve what they get, including subsistence-level wages and unsafe working conditions. If this is how you treat people you like and people you're defending, I hope to always stay on your bad side!
Says who? You? You know how I know it's worth that much? Because he already has that much. The free market has decided.
>That's where Bezos was decades ago.
Nope.
>So basically, you agree with me except that you had to jump in to defend a poor defenseless multibillion dollar international company?
My principles don't discriminate by dollar figure or other arbitrary measures. That's what makes them principles.
>Great: why don't you do that instead of derailing any effort by jumping in to defend Amazon?
I can do both? Isn't that what you were preaching before?
>Dude, you're so set on diverting focus away from Amazon's wrong doing if Amazon literally stabbed someone you'd comment how it alleviated their high blood pressure.
Great strawman. We're done here.