> CFR is heavily skewed towards the old and frail with significant co-morbidities
Characterizing this demographic as "old and frail" is a bit much. And there's no science limiting this analysis to "significant" comorbidities. I hate to pick on one adjective, but it really seems like you believe that everyone who dies from this disease is at death's door already. There is absolutely no science to support that.
> the majority of the susceptible will succumb to it on the first contact.
And that's not correct at all. Even the most at-risk groups have a 90%+ survival rate.
Characterizing this demographic as "old and frail" is a bit much. And there's no science limiting this analysis to "significant" comorbidities. I hate to pick on one adjective, but it really seems like you believe that everyone who dies from this disease is at death's door already. There is absolutely no science to support that.
> the majority of the susceptible will succumb to it on the first contact.
And that's not correct at all. Even the most at-risk groups have a 90%+ survival rate.