Nurses and doctors work in close proximity to people who are sick. So 50 cm compared to 2 meters.
This is why their viral load would be more.
Given a default R of 2 to 2.5 what model are you implying makes this worse in terms of viral load given a reduced R? How would this work?
This bit need explaining because it sounds like you are implying with a R of 2 to 2.5 then the average person might get a higher viral load than if R was .9 lets say.
I don't think a room would have 10 people with mild cases.
So this needs to be modelled realistically.
I think there's a small chance one person in the room has it for R0 = 2.5 compared with a not quite as small chance one person in the room has it for a lesser R.
Also I also don't think being in a room with multiple people effects load.
I think it's distance. A cough from a person within 50cm is far far worse than 2 people breathing.
So this is my junk science claim, this needs to be backed with numbers. It's not logical R effects load exposure to me, where is this evidence from?
Else this is dangerous information, exactly the same as saying it's just the flu.
Nurses and doctors work in close proximity to people who are sick. So 50 cm compared to 2 meters.
This is why their viral load would be more.
Given a default R of 2 to 2.5 what model are you implying makes this worse in terms of viral load given a reduced R? How would this work?
This bit need explaining because it sounds like you are implying with a R of 2 to 2.5 then the average person might get a higher viral load than if R was .9 lets say.