Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
REPLicated2
on April 19, 2020
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
A Full Break of the Bitstream Encryption of Xilinx...
Depending on your viewpoint, this may actually be a boon for reverse engineering efforts to counter planned obsolescence.
segfaultbuserr
on April 19, 2020
[–]
Yes. Unfortunately, it's a double-edged sword. The same technology is needed for the FOSS community to create secure hardware.
snvzz
on April 19, 2020
|
parent
[–]
Security through obscurity? Nah.
loeg
on April 19, 2020
|
root
|
parent
[–]
This was security through a cryptographic design. It was just a broken design. If you consider confidential symmetric or privkeys "obscurity," sure, all crypto is obscurity.
snvzz
on April 19, 2020
|
root
|
parent
[–]
There's no need to encrypt the keys as you hardcode them into the FPGA, if you control the hardware as you do this.
I certainly don't see how anything FOSS would be affected, and would appreciate concrete examples.
johncolanduoni
on April 19, 2020
|
root
|
parent
[–]
This mechanism also included an HMAC, responsible for authenticating the bitstream. That's useful even if the bitstream is public knowledge.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: