Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I can't read this because of the paywall. The headline is wrong, which doesn't give me a feeling that it is worth reading anyway.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_temperature_record




> The headline is wrong

In case you've been living under a rock, in the current cultural context "warmest ever" means "warmest since records began".


What year did records begin?

What did the data set look like then (spatial diversity, measurement variance, etc...)

How do you compare that data set to one collected this year?


Disable JS. I personally have a deciated browser for reading stuff with JS off by default and enable it for each site I consider it deserves JS (like if is using it for interactivity,maps or is a true app and not an article)


Okay, add the phrase “in recent time” which is the relevant assumption


I’m not the one making an article with a lie as a headline. Why is everyone okay with prefacing data with deception?


The headline's meaning is obvious - it's clear what you are doing.


So then you know that I am calling out the headline of scientific article for being a lie. Do you think headlines of scientific articles should be lies?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: