Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You would probably need the kernel / filesystem to keep track of it to keep it efficient. And even then that is iffy if you implement it as a kernel extension vs. something integrated into filesystem code.

I've found arq backup overall slow once you start hitting 0.5TB overall. It's a design issue.



> You would probably need the kernel / filesystem to keep track of it to keep it efficient

I believe most operating systems have a mechanism for this. E.g. on macOS it's called fsevents, Linux has inotify


Yes, these utilities would probably need something in them such that fswatch implements (https://emcrisostomo.github.io/fswatch/) - very useful.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: