It's good to reference RFC 2119 and using the language there.
But other than that, it seems like a terrible response to the question asked, missing the point of the original question by at least 80%. Or phrased another way, it sounds like somebody's trying to push for RFC 2119 and sacrifices giving good answers to questions.
But other than that, it seems like a terrible response to the question asked, missing the point of the original question by at least 80%. Or phrased another way, it sounds like somebody's trying to push for RFC 2119 and sacrifices giving good answers to questions.