I can't find any of the court filings publicly online - I'd probably have to spend money on PACER or something - but it seems possible to me that Buzzfeed had no access to the exact details of what contaminated the pods. Is it necessary to know precisely what it was if Juul employees are on record voicing concerns about product quality and being dismissed? Are some kinds of contaminants not bad enough to matter?
The article has plenty of detail. The person filing is a former employee making easily disproved accusations, what would be the point of suing and then having it immediately tossed out because he can't prove anything was contaminated? He even cites the supplier it came from.
PACER is free if you don't go over $15 in a quarter (occasionally interested nonlawyers won't) and cases in the news are often on RECAP (you can assist them by downloading their browser extension)
The article has plenty of detail. The person filing is a former employee making easily disproved accusations, what would be the point of suing and then having it immediately tossed out because he can't prove anything was contaminated? He even cites the supplier it came from.