Depends on what you mean by "foreign", it's research done by UK scientists. If you want to play that card, the IPCC itself is funded by "foreign governments", so you can go right ahead and denounce all climate science as a foreign influence operation.

Honestly, I find the continued denial of the climate crisis very depressing (obviously I refer in part to your post Bucephalus355).

IPCC is a governmental lobby indeed that's why governmental reviewers have the final word on what appears in the report (Article 11 of IPCC legal statuses).

Your post confused me. I though you were saying that this report was to be suspicious because is coming from an organization that maybe have ties to China.

But it seems this report have nothing to do with that organization, but with some European universities.

So, what are you saying? that the report is right but 'maybe' it was funded by another country because you don't like it?

Ultimately I doubt it matters very much to OP exactly how you interpret it, as long as you don't think about the climate crisis.

The real question, is why for our very own military industry, we never have studied it. Why did we need others to fund it?

> and this has to be a global effort.

I think we had an agreement in place with just that goal.