I always thought a good answer to this was "well I'd think about copying a car if I could..."
How sweet would that be? Friend gets a car, I make a copy of it at zero cost!
I guess the standard answer to that would be "but you're depriving the manufacturer of money to cover the costs of providing the car in the first place"
Which is reasonable, but I'd have to question their business model if their manufacturing costs are so high and yet I can copy it for free ...
Nah, the standard answer isn't reasonable. They're depriving themselves of that money by choosing a business model that matches neither the customer needs nor physical reality.
In hopes it'll one day turn into a catchphrase: no one is entitled to have a particular business model working for them forever.
In fairness I'd give them that much. There is a quid pro quo between me having a need, and a business providing that need. If it's not commercially viable for a business to then perhaps my need may go unfulfilled.
What irks me is that such a gracious outlook leaves me open to being gouged by profiteers.
How sweet would that be? Friend gets a car, I make a copy of it at zero cost!
I guess the standard answer to that would be "but you're depriving the manufacturer of money to cover the costs of providing the car in the first place"
Which is reasonable, but I'd have to question their business model if their manufacturing costs are so high and yet I can copy it for free ...