Anon had (sort of) taken credit on twitter, but the message was quickly replaced with "We cant confirm anything because we'll lose our accounts again."
Sorry. Anon pulled it, then posted another statement saying that they couldn't confirm for fear of losing their accounts again. Screenshot of the original tweet in the post on TNW.
Does anyone know how much traffic Anons botnets could generate? Surely it would be nowhere near enough to have any kind of impact on Amazon's cloud infrastructure..
Must be because of something else such as human error and just really bad timing?
Their most public attack tool, 'LOIC' [1], uses HTTP requests to try and exhaust a target website's connection capacity. It's a simple attack and the tool is flawed [2]. They're not trying to deny service at layer 3, they're attacking the layer 7 web app. It's relatively easy to detect these requests and shrug them off.
Interesting watching everyone immediately crediting 'Anonymous'/Operation Payback for this one...