Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Like I said in the the other thread, it has to be the automaker that stands behind its product with a financial safety guarantee.



> it has to be the automaker that stands behind its product with a financial safety guarantee.

And, as I said, if I were the automaker, I would be extremely hesitant to give such a guarantee with human drivers in the car whose operation of the systems I am unable to control. So cars with such guarantees would basically have to be entirely self-driving, i.e., human intervention not even possible by design. That is a huge increase in required reliability, not to mention a huge change in how cars are currently used. Which is not to say it won't eventually happen, just that such a liability regime would, I think, significantly increase the time it will take to get to ubiquitous use of self-driving cars.


Yes, I am talking about fully self driving cars.

You could still have "dual mode" cars that could be switched to manual mode, perhaps only when parked.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: