A more modest goal would be to remain open to the wonders of fields you know little about.
As one example close to my heart: there is a streak within the tech community that rejects anything that isn't "pure" science. To quote the only good joke from the Big Bang Theory: "Oh, the humanities!".
If you read Feynman, one of the more modern Renaissance Men, you will see this streak in action. He deeply appreciate fields rather far from physics, including linguistics, music, and art, and even succeeded in some of them independent of his main career. He also showed that "appreciation for" does not require uncritical believe, specifically minting the term "cargo-cult science" for what he saw as a weakness in the field.
As one example close to my heart: there is a streak within the tech community that rejects anything that isn't "pure" science. To quote the only good joke from the Big Bang Theory: "Oh, the humanities!".
If you read Feynman, one of the more modern Renaissance Men, you will see this streak in action. He deeply appreciate fields rather far from physics, including linguistics, music, and art, and even succeeded in some of them independent of his main career. He also showed that "appreciation for" does not require uncritical believe, specifically minting the term "cargo-cult science" for what he saw as a weakness in the field.