Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

But a coin flip on a large number of people would trend toward 50% predictions over time.



And a correlation of 0%


Right, but I'm trying to get at 56% isn't great cause random is 50, and there's no clarify on correlation of the measure that gets to 56.


Correlation is not probability. You can't compare them at all. Flipping a coin for each student would produce a correlation of 0, far lower than the correlation of 0.56 cited above. Have a look at some plots of data [1] with different correlation coefficients to see how dramatic it can be. Note the difference between r = 0.00 and r = 0.60. That's about what we're dealing with here.

[1] http://www.bwgriffin.com/gsu/courses/edur7130/images/twelve_...


Which is worse than 56%


Yeah, but if randomness gets you 50, 56 doesn't feel that useful.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: