Given this article, I really don't think that they deserve their self appointed strapline; 'Academic rigour, journalistic flair'.
From the crude and inaccurate broad brush descriptions of modern attitudes to blasphemy, through to presenting the song 'Always look on the bright side of life' as an example of nihilism, this reads like a poorly researched high school essay, with a Kant quote thrown in at the end to try and make it sound clever.
It's a confusingly desert-dry article about an oceanically-wet piece of classic cinema. It's almost worth reading the article to see how someone can turn a hugely fun and enjoyable film into such a bland review.
I expected wolf-nipple-tips but was delivered stale bread.
Just noticed that that the author is Emeritus Professor in the History of Religious Thought from The University of Queensland. I might drop him an email to enquire how that could have possibly occurred and if anybody has yet noticed their mistake.
From the crude and inaccurate broad brush descriptions of modern attitudes to blasphemy, through to presenting the song 'Always look on the bright side of life' as an example of nihilism, this reads like a poorly researched high school essay, with a Kant quote thrown in at the end to try and make it sound clever.