As a brown person this pisses me off, liberals keep pushing for these social justice rules on the platforms to silence content they find offending.
If your argument is that "they don't have right to access the platform", you are acting ignorant when you know there are only handful of platforms on internet.
The next step would be blocking DNS registrations of websites whose content you don't agree with, oh wait there is entire country which does this and you disagree with that country's rules too.
> you are acting ignorant when you know there are only handful of platforms on internet.
Your continued participation in said platforms ensures that they will remain the "only" platforms on the internet.
There is absolutely nothing guaranteeing you a right to have a private entity host your information, especially when you're paying absolutely nothing for them to do so.
> The next step would be blocking DNS registrations of websites whose content you don't agree with
You do realize calling slippery slope a fallacy does not mean it's something you should ignore... right? Incrementalism is -by far- the most common technique used to implement totalitarianism.
Blocking access to information via DNS blocks is an entirely different concept than private entities not wishing to host extremist content on their private platforms.
If your argument is that "they don't have right to access the platform", you are acting ignorant when you know there are only handful of platforms on internet.
The next step would be blocking DNS registrations of websites whose content you don't agree with, oh wait there is entire country which does this and you disagree with that country's rules too.