Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

One step at a time. Having physical control over data definitely is an improvement. Not everyone believes conspiracy theories about spy microchips in mainboards.



Microsoft Euro branch is still subject to US law. The US can still seize your data.


Yes, that is why you use azure stack and not azure. It's a licensed version of the software that you can run completely independent of Microsoft.


licenses usually include provisions for being disabled if the parent country requires it. see what happened to iran when US levied sanctions


Disabled != data changes hands.


Usually you want that unless you don’t and you don’t here :)


> believes conspiracy theories about spy microchips in mainboards.

You mean not everyone believes the cold, hard truth?

That's unfortunate, because most of us here saw the evidence of this taking place.


If you're talking about Intel ME, just use AMD or ARM.



I thought there is a great level of control over these and none of these run Minix and connect to the network. The actual functionality that ME is supposed to provide is purposeful.


No one outside of Bloomberg has seen any evidence of mainboard spy chips. You must be thinking about CPUs.


No, I'm thinking about what we read in the Snowden leaks (if you bothered reading them).


I did read them. Which part are you referring to? If it is GODSURGE then it is malware in the BIOS used by the NSA. I have seen nothing about China spying via motherboards, outside the propaganda hit piece Bloomberg wrote which everyone (even FBI and Amazon, etc) dismissed as total bullcrap.


Interesting. Can you provide a source?



How is that a chip in a mainboard? The mainboard story was a propaganda piece in Bloomberg aimed at China.


Afaik the processor is a chip on the mainboard. I personally don't care which part of the mainboard carries the backdoor.


With respect, what you linked to is a conspiracy theory that the ME is used in ways other than explicitly stated by Intel and unsupported by any evidence other than allegation.


"Can be used in ways other than explicitly stated" quickly turns into "is used": "https://hackaday.com/2017/12/07/another-defeat-of-the-intel-...

"The Intel Management Engine with its proprietary firmware has complete access to and control over the PC: it can power on or shut down the PC, read all open files, examine all running applications, track all keys pressed and mouse movements, and even capture or display images on the screen. And it has a network interface that is demonstrably insecure, which can allow an attacker on the network to inject rootkits that completely compromise the PC and can report to the attacker all activities performed on the PC. It is a threat to freedom, security, and privacy that can't be ignored." - Hackaday


A part of my machine which I have no control over and which I cannot remove is a backdoor. Some would call that even malware. I don't care whether it has been solely used for the intended purpose which I can't even verify.


The Snowden leaks.

We saw photographs of this taking place in what looked like an assembly line or distribution centre, along with accompanying text from internal NSA presentation slides.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: