Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's a bit annoying though how much a first-world-only solution this is. OpenStreetMaps was completely useless for my city/country the last five times I tried to use it.



I think you may be in the first world on this one.

I saw a very interesting talk last year about how Google Maps is often useless in third world areas, and OpenStreetMaps provides the only useful coverage.

It's due to armies of volunteers mapping an area during disasters, while Google has no economic interest in mapping the area.

https://media.ccc.de/v/emf2018-157-how-the-internet-has-chan...


"Google has no economic interest in mapping the area"

Google has an economic interest in mapping anything as long as it's useful to some people. Google is playing a very long term game: provide free services online (Email, Maps, Search...) to entice more and more people to go online. The more Internet users there are in the world, the higher their ad revenues are. It's that simple.


I live in West Africa, and yeah I think I'll take the difference between the two services that I've experienced for myself for what it is. Those "armies of volunteers" aren't exactly interested in the region either.


> Those "armies of volunteers" aren't exactly interested in the region either.

I don't doubt your experience.

The talk is about disaster response, so it only describes maps in regions where a response is taking place.

Elsewhere, the rest of the time, I'm under the impression there is no serious mapping taking place, neither by Google or OSM.

What I found surprising from the talk I linked was instances where there was a hardly usable Google Map to use for the area (just big expanses on the map and the occasional large feature), and the fact that at times up to 1000 volunteers would work together mapping a region at short notice, down to street and building level, by analysing satellite images, and coordinating with responders on the ground.

In the opinion of those disaster responders, those volunteer created maps were much more useful than the Google ones.


> The talk is about disaster response

We haven't exactly had one of those in decades, so yeah. I'd say it's a bit telling that there's only interest/means for volunteers to map the developing world when there has been a disaster, but I digress.

Google Maps is perfectly usable where I live (apart from its continued if understandable confusion about how...irregular roads and road access can be here), and in my experience has been at least useful in all the cities in my home country I've visited. OpenStreetMaps is...not.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: