Those are horrible options, worse than all three alternatives discussed (bird, aerial, satellite).
Detail: That’s not specific enough. It could refer to everything and anything.
Image and Photo: People do not really use these words to refer to aerial and satellite photography. People might think it’s some kind of photo-mode (referring to actual photos that are somehow placed on the map).
Obviously you would have to test this to be really sure that someone has a problem with these – but to me their problematic nature seems quite obvious.
Realistically it would, however, not really be realistic to test (all) changes like these … so you have to trust me that your intuition in this case is horrible.
I mean, even if you test it the effect of anything you suggested would probably be small – but to me choices like those are what make software really and truly awful.
Detail: That’s not specific enough. It could refer to everything and anything.
Image and Photo: People do not really use these words to refer to aerial and satellite photography. People might think it’s some kind of photo-mode (referring to actual photos that are somehow placed on the map).
Obviously you would have to test this to be really sure that someone has a problem with these – but to me their problematic nature seems quite obvious.
Realistically it would, however, not really be realistic to test (all) changes like these … so you have to trust me that your intuition in this case is horrible.
I mean, even if you test it the effect of anything you suggested would probably be small – but to me choices like those are what make software really and truly awful.