so, because in this one time the company was as vulnerable as the person, the law is.... what? I can't even guess where you were going with your point!
I'm guessing that it was: Corporations are people too? Otherwise, likewise, I can't fathom what the point of the anecdote was.
If the company was truly in the wrong, then it going out of business isn't - necessarily - a bad thing. It sucks for the employed by it, yes, but - in the overall scheme - perhaps it was for the best?
Either way, there's - clearly - not enough information for this to be worthwhile.
