> Maybe start by not making it an issue that only geeks or tech savvy types are outraged about.
I also think that in order to unite the wide public for a cause, we should have a clear message about the dangers of no neutrality being explainable to a kid.
But I wonder what is the biggest danger we try to warn about?
Some people think its just about not having bandwidth to watch 4k videos. Some people think its about lack of privacy.
Others mostly disturbed by the possibility of losing our very access to information itself. That is, public knowledge being manipulated. What does that mean for society?
I also think that in order to unite the wide public for a cause, we should have a clear message about the dangers of no neutrality being explainable to a kid.
But I wonder what is the biggest danger we try to warn about?
Some people think its just about not having bandwidth to watch 4k videos. Some people think its about lack of privacy. Others mostly disturbed by the possibility of losing our very access to information itself. That is, public knowledge being manipulated. What does that mean for society?