Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Sure, in principle. Have you ever seen an actual slide rule with linear scales?



In some sense. A way to teach how a slide rule works is by using two rulers to create a slide rule that does addition. Most pupils will understand why that works. The jump from there to really understanding why logarithmic scales work is a lot harder for most, but I’m sure that intermediate step helps some pupils.

(Google gave me http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/AdditionSlideRule/, but not an example of using normal rulers to make such a slide rule)


> In some sense.

Oh, come on. I'm not talking about a home-brew slide rule or a virtual slide rule simulation. Obviously it is possible to make those. I'm talking about an actual manufactured slide rule sold as a product and used in a working environment to perform addition.


Most slide rules have a linear scale on them, but it is intended to be used along with a logarithmic scale for working with exponential/logarithm functions.

In general slide rules aren’t used for addition because 3-digit addition is very fast to compute mentally or using pen and paper.


Mine had them. I don't think that I'd prefer it for accounting work, though.


> Mine had them.

I doubt that very much. Do you have a photograph?

I used to collect slide rules. I have never seen one with a linear scale, and I can't find any evidence on the web that any such slide rule was ever manufactured. So if you can provide evidence that you possessed such a slide rule, that would be of significant historical interest.


Isn't the "L" scale on a slide rule linear? See the photo at the top of the Wikipedia page [1] for example. (I may be confused here, since you know slide rules better than me.)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slide_rule


Sure, but to do addition you need two linear scales, one on the fixed part and one on the slider. The L scale is for computing logarithms, not for doing additions.


If the L scale is on the slider, and you’re not too much concerned accuracy (the procedure does 5 ‘align scales’ operations before the final ‘read the result’) one linear scale is sufficient, if you use the hairline on the cursor as a kind of memory:

”Example: calculate 0.23 + 0.45

- "Reset" the rule so that all the scales are lined up.

- Move the cursor to 0.23 on the L scale.

- Move the leftmost 0 on the L scale to the hairline.

- Move the cursor to 0.45 on the L scale.

- Reset the rule again so that all the scales are lined up.

- The cursor should now be at 0.68 on the L scale, which is the sum of 0.23 + 0.45.”

(from http://www.antiquark.com/2005/01/slide-rule-tricks.html)


Another possibility:

Using a sledge hammer, break the slide rule into N pieces, taking care to insure that N is greater than the sum you wish to compute. Now to compute the sum of A and B, count out A pieces into a paper bag, then count out B pieces into the same paper bag. Now empty the bag onto a clean workspace and count the total number of pieces to produce the result.

https://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/~steve/astrophysics/webpages/baro...


Yes, but I'm not sure you could easily use them for addition. They exist to lookup the value of various logarithms. Adding's pretty fast anyway.


I checked, and sure enough you're correct. I could have sworn that I'd had two linear scales, but … I was completely wrong. Been decades since I used it, and the memories obviously faded.


No worries, happens to everyone. But I appreciate you confirming that.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: