Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I had the same thought - he seems to have indulged in the data quite a bit to come up with such a thourough analysis.



What was thorough about his analysis? He mentions a few things that could easily be detected with grep within a corpus of millions of messages.


I would love to hear his explanation for why he thought reading through them all was necessary. I'm not surprised the city requested 3rd party proof he had deleted them, he clearly demonstrated a fascination with their contents




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: