> Because your point is pretty shallow, to be honest. The simple fact is that such tactics do happen in virtually every situation you described.
Not to the same extent. That’s the point, and it’s an interesting question why this happens. What economic factors account for the differences in advertising between these two markets? It’s not “shallow” as your own shallow dismissal alleges.
> Your point really doesn't add much to a conversation, since its premise is faulty.
People who live in glass houses should not throw stones.
Not to the same extent. That’s the point, and it’s an interesting question why this happens. What economic factors account for the differences in advertising between these two markets? It’s not “shallow” as your own shallow dismissal alleges.
> Your point really doesn't add much to a conversation, since its premise is faulty.
People who live in glass houses should not throw stones.