Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Our two main political parties constantly fight to appoint their preferred candidate to the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court were just following some apolitical procedure of interpretation, none of that would be necessary.



"some apolitical procedure of interpretation"

I'm down. But who gets to decide what's an apolitical procedure of interpretation? And what does that even look like?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: